Legal Opinion

State v. Noble

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1980No. 4924-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted defendant’s petition for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, Department B, in order to consider two questions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 31.19, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.

1. Did the defendant, by admitting on direct examination to two prior convictions, waive the right to question on appeal the trial court’s ruling denying his pretrial motion to exclude the prior convictions?

2. Did the trial court err in finding that the probative value of the prior convictions outweighed their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. EllersonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. DommeArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AllieArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. HicksArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API