Legal Opinion

People v. Kozakis

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1951No. Crim. 4561PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3 of the Penal Code * after trial before a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant urges the judgment should be reversed on two grounds, neither of which is tenable: First: that the court erred in receiving remote and prejudicial evidence; and Second: that the evidence presented showed that defendant was entrapped into the commission of the crime by a police officer.

Facts: Officer Xydias on October 26, 1949, entered defendant’s coffee shop and card club. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. People v. RomanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. VanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API