People v. Kozakis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3 of the Penal Code * after trial before a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendant urges the judgment should be reversed on two grounds, neither of which is tenable: First: that the court erred in receiving remote and prejudicial evidence; and Second: that the evidence presented showed that defendant was entrapped into the commission of the crime by a police officer.
Facts: Officer Xydias on October 26, 1949, entered defendant’s coffee shop and card club. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- People v. RomanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. VanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.