Legal Opinion

Committee v. P. U. C

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949No. 31260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The dismissal order of the commission recites that the company had taken care of the accumulation of wild growth, debris and rubbish along and between the yard tracks, and no further mention is made of that subject in the order.

The order of the commission finds it had jurisdiction by virtue of Section 614-3, General Code, to promulgate and enforce proper orders relating to the protection, welfare and safety of railroad employees and the traveling public and citesAkron Barberton Belt Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission,148 Ohio St. 282, 74 N.E.2d 256.

The order states that the sole question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Akron & Barberton Belt Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Co-Operative Legislative Committee of the Transportation Brotherhoods v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Brotherhood L. F. E. v. M. O. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. Flittner v. BaldwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API