Legal Opinion
Saiz v. Barham
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1983No. 7347PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
This interlocutory appeal involves the expiration of the limitation period and expiration of the tolling of the limitation period for filing a medical malpractice suit.
Defendant is a health care provider, NMSA 1978, Section 41-5-3(A) (Repl.Pamp. 1982), qualified under the Medical Malpractice Act, NMSA 1978, Section 41-5-6 (Repl.Pamp.1982). A condition precedent to suing defendant for malpractice was the filing of an application to the medical review commission to review the malpractice claim. NMSA 1978, §§ 41-5-14(A) and 41-5-15 (Repl.Pamp.1982).
Plaintiff applied for such a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 264, Laborers' International Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Katherine DECKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Lindsey v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Otero v. ZouharNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Trujillo v. PuroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dutton v. McKinley County Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Otero v. ZouharNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rupp v. HurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.