Legal Opinion

People v. James-Robinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1983No. 66256, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

This case concerns the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s criminal record as a basis for expert opinion on the defendant’s sanity.

We hold that such evidence is admissible subject to the trial court’s discretion.

James Robinson, Jr., was charged with second-degree criminal sexual conduct. MCL 750.520c(l)(a); MSA 28.788(3)(l)(a). At the jury trial, the defendant entered a defense of not guilty by reason of insanity. Dr. William Canty, a psychologist, testified on behalf of the defendant that in his opinion the defendant had been mentally ill for many years and could not have formed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GolochowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. DerMartzexMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. WilkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. MatthewsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. WilkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MusserMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. UllahMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API