Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Seattle Automobile Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1928No. 21322. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Two separate actions were instituted by different plaintiffs against the same defendants to recover damages suffered in an automobile collision. These actions were consolidated for the purpose of the trial below, and a jury rendered separate verdicts, one in favor of each set of plaintiffs and against the defendant Seattle Automobile Company only. Judgments were entered on the verdicts, and the Seattle Automobile Company has appealed, the cases being now consolidated for the purpose of this appeal.

The errors assigned raise only questions as to instructions given and refused. As to the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sothoron v. WestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. White v. PinneyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Motor Terminal & Transportation Co. v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Fried v. KornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Eastman v. SilvaWashington Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API