Candace Curtis v. Anita Brunsting
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the scope of the probate exception to federal subject-matter jurisdiction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Marshall v. Marshall. 1 The Plaintiff contends that, under Marshall, her claims for breach of fiduciary duty against the co-trustees of an inter vivos trust do not implicate the probate exception. We agree.
I
In 1996, Elmer H. and Nelva E. Brunst-ing, Texas residents, established the Brunsting Family Living Trust (“the Trust”) for the benefit of their offspring. At the time of its creation, the Trust was funded with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Borden v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
3Cited by40 opinions
- Caroline Chevalier v. Kimberly BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Lee Graham Shopping Center v. Estate of Diane Z. KirschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Wolfram v. WolframDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Oliver v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.