Legal Opinion

Candace Curtis v. Anita Brunsting

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2013No. 12-20164PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns the scope of the probate exception to federal subject-matter jurisdiction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Marshall v. Marshall. 1 The Plaintiff contends that, under Marshall, her claims for breach of fiduciary duty against the co-trustees of an inter vivos trust do not implicate the probate exception. We agree.

I

In 1996, Elmer H. and Nelva E. Brunst-ing, Texas residents, established the Brunsting Family Living Trust (“the Trust”) for the benefit of their offspring. At the time of its creation, the Trust was funded with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Borden v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Caroline Chevalier v. Kimberly BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Lee Graham Shopping Center v. Estate of Diane Z. KirschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Wolfram v. WolframDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Oliver v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API