Legal Opinion

In re the Search of Odys Loox Plus Tablet, Serial Number 4707213703415

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 20, 2014No. Magistrate Case No. 14-265 (JMF), Magistrate Case No. 14-266 (JMF), Magistrate Case No. 14-267 (JMF), Magistrate Case No. 14-268 (JMF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*41MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court are. four Applications for search and seizure warrants pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for four electronic devices. See Affidavit In Support of an Application for a Search Warrant at 29 (hereinafter the “Affidavit”).1 For the first time, the government’s Application includes an “Attachment C (Search Protocol),” which purports to address concerns the Court raised in In the Matter of the Search of Black iPhone 4, S/N Not Available, Mag. Case No. 14-235, 27…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. In re the Search of Black Iphone 4District Court, District of Columbia · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re a Warrant for All Content & Other Information Associated with the Email Account xxxxxxx@ Gmail.com Maintained at Premises Controlled by Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER MCLAWHORNCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  3. State of New Jersey v. Phillip D. Bryant and James HunterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API