Legal Opinion

Law Offices of Bruce Altschuld v. William Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2015No. 13-56316UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiffs Law Offices of Bruce Altschuld and Bruce Altschuld (together, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s award of $4,888.10 in attorneys’ fees and costs to Defendants Realwealth Corporation (“Realwealth”) and William Wilson (together, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs brought a malicious prosecution claim against Defendants in district court based on a prior state-court action in which Real-wealth obtained á $400,000 judgment against Plaintiffs on its cross-claim for legal malpractice. Defendants moved to strike the malicious prosecution claim under California’s anti-SLAPP…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. HineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Johnson v. AltamiranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Miletak v. Acuity Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Shaun Fleck v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API