Law Offices of Bruce Altschuld v. William Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiffs Law Offices of Bruce Altschuld and Bruce Altschuld (together, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s award of $4,888.10 in attorneys’ fees and costs to Defendants Realwealth Corporation (“Realwealth”) and William Wilson (together, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs brought a malicious prosecution claim against Defendants in district court based on a prior state-court action in which Real-wealth obtained á $400,000 judgment against Plaintiffs on its cross-claim for legal malpractice. Defendants moved to strike the malicious prosecution claim under California’s anti-SLAPP…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garrett v. HineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Johnson v. AltamiranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Miletak v. Acuity Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Shaun Fleck v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026