Legal Opinion

Pena v. Britton, Cohen, Cassell, Kaufman & Schantz, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1992No. 91-1485Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, defendant counter-claimant in the trial court, seeks review of an order of the trial court awarding the appellees attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1989).

The appellant retained the appellee law firm to protect his rights in the stock of Batavus Construction Co., Inc. Batavus filed for protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Act. The appellee filed claims in the bankruptcy court against Julio Amo-ros, Batavus, Richard Wheeler, and United Minerals and Chemicals, for imposition of a constructive trust on the shares of Batavus transferred by Wagner to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fierer v. 18th Ave. Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. White v. Montebello Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Kisling v. WooldridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API