Legal Opinion

Luers, Et Ux. v. Kuykendall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 27, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The appeal. is from an order denying motion to dismiss the amended bill of complaint, the purpose of which bill of complaint is to foreclose certain improvement lien certificates issued by the City of Sarasota and which had been assigned by the City Tax Collector to one Charles M. Williams and which had been assigned by Williams to the complainant Kuykendall. Harry B. Luers and his wife, Mrs. Harry B. Luers, were made parties defendant as record owners.

The assignments relied upon are as follows:

“Principal amount of certificate________$1070.10

One-third reduction on principal—Sec.

82 JV…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State of Fla. Ex Rel. Johnson v. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of HomesteadSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. LynchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1975
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  4. Packard v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API