Legal Opinion

Nieman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2002, which denied plaintiffs renewed motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We see no reason to, in effect, reconsider our affirmance of the motion court’s denial of plaintiffs original motion to vacate this action’s dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404 (291 AD2d 291 [2002]). While plaintiff now argues that his case had not yet acquired post-note of issue status at the time of its dismissal and that the dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404 was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Sam Minskoff & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Nieman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Bradley v. KonakanchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Goldstein v. SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API