Legal Opinion

King v. Munzer

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided May 15, 1894Published

Action by Bennett J. King against Alfred Munzer and others. A motion was made to require each party to pay half the expense of transcribing the stenographer’s minutes. Granted. For decision on trial at equity term, see 28 H. Y. Supp. 587.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The decision in Griggs v. Guinn (Super. N. Y.) 21 N. Y. Supp. 451, applies only to trials before referees. This action was tried at the special term of the court, and the stenographer’s minutes were required in order to aid the court in reaching a decision. Section 289 of the Code covers the case. It authorizes the court to direct that one-half the expense be paid by each of the parties, and the amount so paid by compulsory order becomes a necessary disbursement. The order may be made at the trial or at any time afterwards. Abendroth v. Railroad Co., 9 Civ. Proc. R. 406. The case cited is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griggs v. GuinnThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API