Legal Opinion
Cates v. Creamer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2005No. 03-10404Published
1Opinion of the Court
431 F.3d 456
Priscilla S. CATES, Individually and as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Bobby Ray Cates, an Incapacitated Person, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
Matthew Scott CREAMER, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
Lamae Creamer; Hertz Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-10404.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 28, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Charles William Fillmore (argued), The Fillmore Law Firm, Fort Worth, TX, Stephen Morris Briley, Banner, Briley & White, Wichita Falls, TX, for Cates.
Charles William Oldham (argued), Meredith Lea Kennedy, Oldham,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Kenneth Smith v. Transworld Drilling Company Vessel, Rig 44, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Shows v. Jamison Bedding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Schneider v. Esperanza Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.