Legal Opinion

Newman v. Roth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1942Published

1DissentClose, J.

The agreement upon which this action is based was a compromise agreement settling a dispute that existed among these coadventurers and must be viewed in that light. Pursuant to the agreement, the plaintiff’s testator guaranteed the payment of a portion of a debt owed to the Roth Estate by the Newman & Carey Subway Construction Company, which portion could not exceed the sum of $95,809.32 and might, under the *358terms of the agreement, be less. The agreement provided that in case of the death of the plaintiff’s testator any unpaid balance of the amount that he had guaranteed could be paid by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. . BlanchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Blanchard v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API