Legal Opinion

Craven v. Bates, Kingsbery & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 1, 1895PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Milner. Catoosa superior court. February term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

It appears that Henry L. Craven made and delivered to Bates, Kingsbery & Co. three promissory notes, which on their face bore interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum; and that afterwards James R. Craven, by an instrument in writing, guaranteed the payment of these notes. An action was brought upon this instrument by Bates, Kingsbery & Co., and the only defense which it is now material to notice was: that these notes were executed and made payable in the State of Tennessee; that under the' laws of that State they were usurious and void, and consequently the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Champion v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Wiggins Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Farmers' & Traders' Bank v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Farmers' Bank v. BurchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barranger v. BaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Jones v. LawmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. HARVEY v. MERCHANSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  5. Norman v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API