Legal Opinion

City of Burlington v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The facts are not in dispute. The defendant Pieters was an automobile salesman earning $40 a week and residing in Burlington. For a number of years he had been, and was at the time of his injury, a member of the volunteer fire department of the city. The members of the department responded to calls. The chief and one or two others were the only regular employees. The volunteer fire*537men received no regular pay, but they received an average of about $12 a year.

In May, 1925, Pieters received a telephone call at his home, notifying him of a fire, and he immediately reported to the fire station,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Superior v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Flannagan v. BuxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Village of Creve Coeur v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Pueblo v. FlandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Latrobe BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Village of Schofield v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Miller v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API