Legal Opinion
WPP Group USA, Inc. v. Interpublic Group of Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*297The writings at issue on this appeal are an unsigned facsimile ("fax”), allegedly constituting a nonsolicitation agreement with respect to employees of two of plaintiffs subsidiaries, and a subsequent written purchase agreement between the same parties relating to the sale of a third subsidiary. The fax was unsigned but on the letterhead of the sender, defendant Inter-public Group of Companies, Inc.
In denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the IAS Court found that there was a question of fact as to whether the nonsolicitation agreement was superseded by the purchase agreement, an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- International Trading & Sales, Inc. v. Philipp Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. Estate of ShortNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. Estate of ShortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pollak v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Silver v. SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Gedula 26, LLC v. Lightstone Acquisitions III LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Retail Consulting Servs., Inc. v. New TSI Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Retail Consulting Servs., Inc. v. New TSI Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.