Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Allard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

Bill of Interpleader. The case involves the construction of R. S. Ch. 86, Sec. 57 and Ch. 81, Sec. 32 providing for attaching and levying upon real estate.

The plaintiff maintains that a vendor of land who has given a bond for a deed, even though he has received a negotiable promissory note for the purchase price, has an attachable interest in the land contracted to be conveyed. The defendant contends that under such conditions the vendor has no attachable interest. This, quoting the language of the decree appealed from, is “the fundamental question here to be decided.”

To summarize the facts:…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dalrymple v. Security Improvement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Reid v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Welles v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Jordon v. CheneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martel v. BearceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Pevehouse v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API