Camp v. Dallas Nat. Bank

Tn its motion for rehearing, Dallas National Bank contends that this court erred in affirming the judgment below as to Poster and Davisson. I am of opinion that this contention is well taken, and, as the majority adheres to the decision heretofore announced, I will state briefly the reasons for my dissent.

In holding Mr. Camp liable on the note, as maker, we proceeded on the theory that the letter written by him to the Automatic Inn Company, of date September 30,1926, and the note signed by Poster and Davisson, without consideration moving to them, for the benefit of Mr. Camp and Louis…