Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Cigna Health Plan of Arizona

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2003No. 02-16460; D.C. No. CV-01-01429-EHCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Cigna Healthcare of Arizona (“Cigna”)1 appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration of an employment dispute brought by Dr. Francis J. Barnett. Because the facts are known to the parties, we do not recite them here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1).2 We affirm the district court.

The district court properly denied Cigna’s motion because the arbitration provisions contained in Cigna’s employee handbook were never incorporated into the employment contract between Cigna and Dr. Barnett. The contract provided that the parties’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Misty Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and Leo Deleon Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Norman v. Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. Cigna HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API