Olsten v. Susman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
In plaintiff’s suit for damages in the amount of $37,500 for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision, the jury verdict was for defendant. The trial court thereafter granted plaintiff a new trial “on the ground the Court erred in giving Instruction No. 3,” and defendant has appealed. This action arose out of the same automobile collision which gave rise to the appeals decided in Olsten v. Susman, Mo., 362 S.W.2d 612, and Olsten v. Susman, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 328, No. 50,753, handed down concurrently herewith. The facts of the collision are not material to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Sheerin v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Bunch v. CraderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Olsten v. SusmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Endermuehle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Liberty Financial Management Corp. v. Beneficial Data Processing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. MudgettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Olsten v. SusmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. HufferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.