Amaral v. Seekonk Grand Prix Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMaldonado, J.
The Massachusetts recreational use statute 1 provides that those who make their land available to the public for “recreational . . . purposes without imposing a charge or fee therefor . . . shall not be liable for personal injuries . . . sustained by such members of the public ... in the absence of wilful, wanton, or reckless conduct by [the landowner].” G. L. c. 21, § 17C(a), as appearing in St. 1998, c. 268. In this case, we are asked whether the statute bars a claim of negligence asserted by a mother (the plaintiff) who was injured by an errant “go-cart” while watching her sons drive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Longval v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Shu-Ra Ali v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Catanzarite v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Marcus v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gerante v. 202 Sports Complex, LLC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019