Legal Opinion

Michelin Tire Co. v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

This action has been here on two former appeals (116 Or. 217 and 125 Or. 689). On the first appeal a judgment of involuntary nonsuit was affirmed. On the second appeal, a judgment in favor of defendant for $8,000 was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial because the evidence failed to support defendant’s second affirmative defense and counterclaim. On the third trial, verdict and judgment were had for defendant in the sum of $7,591.66, and plaintiff again appeals. The pleadings, with the exception of one amendment thereto, are the same as when before this court on former…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. American Toll Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Peters v. Queen City Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Michelin Tire Co. of Calif. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Reimers v. PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Michelin Tire Co. v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter Construction Co. v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stipe v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Brady v. HodlerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. J. A. Campbell Co. v. CorleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Smith v. Bert M. Morris Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API