Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Schlarf

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 25, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00064Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY MARCUS MAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-64-JD-JEM JENNA SCHLARF, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Timothy Marcus Mayberry, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. ECF 22. He attached a proposed amended complaint and exhibits to his motion. ECF 22-1, 22-2. Because he filed the motion within 21 days after defendant Jenna Schlarf filed her answer and it is his first time amending his complaint, he does not need court approval to file it. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. John Stephen Rowe and Dr. Jeffrey L. Lant v. Michele Shake, Greg Hulse, Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Kenneth A. Marshall v. Stanley KnightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API