Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Breeze v. Brooks

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1886No. 8671PublishedCited by 11 opinions

. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of Commissioner Foote.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This cause was heard before Department Two of this court, and an opinion rendered January 27, 1886. A hearing by the court in Bank was granted, which has been had. For the reasons given ill the opinion in Department, the judgment and order are reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Knudson v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API