Legal Opinion
Georgetown Associates v. Cherokee Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 12, 1982No. 80 C 4887PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Georgetown Associates (“Georgetown”) sues Cherokee Insurance Co. (“Cherokee”) and Nordstrom Agency of Illinois, Inc. (“Nordstrom”), claiming Cherokee breached its contract of insurance by refusing to pay for loss sustained when Georgetown’s outdoor swimming pool unexpectedly popped out of the ground. Georgetown and Cherokee have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Because there are material fact issues, both motions are denied.
Facts
Georgetown is a real estate limited partnership. One of its developments is Georgetown of Willow Bend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Larry Shaw, a Minor by H. L. Shaw, Next Friend, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. J. H. Carson and C. M. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Dow Chemical Company v. Royal Indemnity Company, R. B. Butler, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- J. M. Corbett Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- American Family Mutual Insurance Group v. ClaggettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Moore v. Home Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perzy v. Intercargo Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993