People v. Urfer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
The People appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion, under section 995 of the Penal Code, setting aside an information charging her with possession of marijuana. The motion was based on the ground that the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was the product of an unlawful search and seizure. At issue was the question whether there was a valid consent to the entry of the residence where the marijuana was found. In granting the motion, the court below (which did not state any reason for its ruling) apparently concluded that there was no valid consent.
In November 1967 Rudolph…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Martin v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. AkardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Wiese v. SteinauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RemiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. MittenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. MinerviniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.