Legal Opinion

People v. Cruz

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the court

Julius Hellenbrand, J.

Defendant controverts a second felony offender statement on the ground that the predicate felony conviction was obtained in violation of the constitutional right to be present at his trial.

Defendant was convicted herein after trial of criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree, a B felony. The predicate felony statement alleges a prior conviction of sale of a controlled substance, first degree, an A felony.

After considering the motion papers, the oral argument of counsel and the minutes of the prior trial and hearings therein, the court finds…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. TorresNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API