Legal Opinion

Earl v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1991No. WD 44280PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

This action was instituted by respondent, Virginia Earl, for a declaration of the rights and duties of all the parties under certain insurance policies that appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, sold to Michael VanMeter and his parents, Marian and Beth VanMeter. Both State Farm and Mrs. Earl filed motions for summary judgment. The court below denied State Farm’s motion and granted summary judgment to Mrs. Earl. State Farm appeals from the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions for the trial court to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gast v. EbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. West v. JacobsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Lawton-Byrne-Bruner Ins. Agency Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Podlesak v. WesleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Burns v. Black & Veatch Architects, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Schuster v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Toastmaster, Inc. v. MummertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. SageMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API