Grommes v. Anderson

The plaintiff purchased certain hogs from the defendants, which hogs plaintiff alleges were warranted by defendants as long term treated against cholera. The defendants denied that they warranted the hogs as alleged, but the trial court found in favor of the plaintiff and without reviewing the evidence upon this point, we are satisfied that the evidence was amply sufficient to find that these hogs were warranted as- claimed by the plaintiff. This present action was brought to recover damages for breach of warranty. The case was tried to the court without a jury and the court made findings of…