Legal Opinion

Werner v. Hatton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sedgwick District Court. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.-:

The defendants in error, Hatton and Ruggles, brought suit against Emil Werner and Rosa Werner, before a justice of the peace, to collect a balance of attorneys’ fees of $191. The case was appealed to the district court, tried by a jury, and a verdict and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs for the amount claimed. The defendants claim that the evidence shows that the account sued on did not belong to the plaintiffs. The evidence does show that the account belonged to the plaintiffs at the time suit was brought, and was afterward…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Withers v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Crocker v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
  3. Doom v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
  4. Hoel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API