Legal Opinion

Pisculic v. Pletka

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDaues, P. J.

This is an action to recover the purchase' price of a tombstone or monument made by plaintiff for defendant. The petition is in proper form and contains the following clause, about which, some controversy arises: It is alleged, inter alia, ‘ ‘ that plaintiff fabricated said monument, and on the 5th day of June, 1923, tendered delivery of the same to the defendant and demanded payment of the purchase price of $650, which, under the terms of said contract, defendant bound herself to pay on such delivery and payment of said sum was by defendant refused, etc. ’ ’

Appended to the petition is an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Leahy v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Howard v. StrodeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Missouri Fire Clay Works v. EllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Southern National Bank v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strubinger v. Mid-Union Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API