Pisculic v. Pletka
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaues, P. J.
This is an action to recover the purchase' price of a tombstone or monument made by plaintiff for defendant. The petition is in proper form and contains the following clause, about which, some controversy arises: It is alleged, inter alia, ‘ ‘ that plaintiff fabricated said monument, and on the 5th day of June, 1923, tendered delivery of the same to the defendant and demanded payment of the purchase price of $650, which, under the terms of said contract, defendant bound herself to pay on such delivery and payment of said sum was by defendant refused, etc. ’ ’
Appended to the petition is an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffey v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Leahy v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Howard v. StrodeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Missouri Fire Clay Works v. EllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- State ex rel. Southern National Bank v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strubinger v. Mid-Union Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961