Legal Opinion

Dialcom, LLC v. AT & T Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of *728contract, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated October 17, 2006, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Leave to amend a complaint should be liberally granted absent prejudice to the opposing party, as long as the proposed amendment is not palpably insufficient to state a cause of action (see Jackson Hgts. Care Ctr.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. Boland Rentals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Jackson Heights Care Center, LLC v. BlochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Blum v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Guiliano v. CarlisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castlepoint Insurance Co. v. Command Security Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Benjamin v. 270 Malcolm X Dev., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Lindine v. IasenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Fitzgerald v. ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API