Legal Opinion

Parrott v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 2, 2003No. A-7829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

Following a bench trial, Larry Parrott was convicted of soliciting an undercover policewoman who was posing as a prostitute. He argues that District Court Judge Sigurd E. Murphy should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal because he did not solicit the police offieer-she solicited him. He also argues that he was entrapped by the police and that his arrest violated due process, equal protection, and the separation of powers. Lastly, Parrott argues that the court was clearly mistaken in refusing to impose a suspended imposition of sentence and in ordering…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State, Department of Revenue v. Debenham Electric Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nattrass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  2. Chen v. Cozzoli LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  3. Peters v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API