Legal Opinion
MacNamee v. Hermann
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 2, 1931No. 5179PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant (appellee here) sustaining his motion to strike in an action by plaintiff (appellant here) to recover back $1,500 alleged to have been paid without consideration.
The facts -as stated in the first count of the declaration (admitted to be true by the motion to strike) are substantially as follows: On August 27, 1928, plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing with the defendant, the material parts of which are as follows:
“Received from Christina F. MaeNamee a deposit in the sum of one hundred dollars to be applied as part…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wheeler v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vicki Bagley Realty, Inc. v. LauferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Alois v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Sabghir v. GinsburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Voulgaris v. PressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Brook Haven, Inc. v. SilvermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956