Tabora v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
We consider whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding by the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Arizona (the Board) that Dr. Jorge Tabora engaged in a pattern of charging excessive fees and whether Dr. Tabora had adequate notice that the Board might order him to review his records, provide restitution, and submit a report of restitution. Although we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the Board’s findings and its decision regarding professional conduct, we are of the opinion that Dr. Tabora did not receive adequate notice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Howard v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Justice v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Employment Security Commission v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Cox v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System CouncilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997