Legal Opinion
Vulcan Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 23, 1988No. 381-86CPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover bid preparation costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) alleging that its bid was denied fair and honest consideration because the contracting officer erroneously found the lowest responsive bidder to be “responsible” under special expertise criteria in the solicitation. Defendant moved for summary judgment, and plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment. After consideration of the entire record and after hearing oral argument, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Metropolitan Air Research Testing Authority, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Radva Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.