Legal Opinion

Copin Sastrawidjaya, V Maureen Mughal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 18, 2016No. 47777-7-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Maxa, A.C.J.

¶1 We address the narrow issue of whether a trial court has authority to compel personal injury plaintiffs to sign stipulations and authorizations allowing the defendant to obtain their medical records. We hold that the civil discovery rules do not provide a trial court with that authority. Therefore, we hold that the trial court erred in this case by ordering plaintiffs Copin Sastrawidjaya and Rianne Matheos to sign medical record stipulations requested by defendant Maureen Mughal. We reverse the trial court’s discovery order compelling Sastrawidjaya and Matheos to sign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cedell v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Smith v. Logansport Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Diaz v. Washington State Migrant CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Neal v. BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API