Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Horvath
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 9, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Clapp, Deputy Surrogate.
By the will of Alexander Horvath, Helen Kahl and Thomas Hickey were nominated to be or constituted his executors. She renounced on counsel’s advice that a conflict would spring up between her individual interest and her interest as an executor; and the surrogate ordered letters issued to Mr. Hickey. He, after qualifying and entering upon the duties of his office, died July lJth, 1941. Alleging his death and the termination of the conflict in her interest (the conflict was allegedly resolved by the suit of Hickey v. Kahl, 129 N. J. Eq. 233; 19 Atl. Rep. (2d) 33), she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Judson v. GibbonsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Davis v. . InscoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- In Re the Accounting of KelloggNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Robertson v. McGeochNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Foley v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- County of Cheshire v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974