Legal Opinion
In re Woitasek
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
This is a motion for reargument made by the Attorney-General of the State of New York requesting that the court reconsider an interim disposition which directs that the question as to the offset claimed by the substituted committee of the incompetent be referred to an official referee to report to the court as to the value of the services rendered by the incompetent to the State of New York during his confinement.
It appears that the Superintendent of Boekland State Hospital made a motion to recover from the substituted committee *948of the incompetent the sum of $6,186, representing the claimed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People of State of N.Y. v. . DennisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Samuel Adler, Inc. v. NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Seitz v. MesserschmittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- People v. Greylock Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- People ex rel. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hospital Ass'n of New York State, Inc. v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- State v. CreedonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980