Legal Opinion

Marcum v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 2007No. A06A2184PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

C. Rob Marcum sued Dan Gardner, Jay Steele, and DG Productions, LLC (collectively, “defendants”), seeking to recover money that *454lie allegedly loaned to them. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that the money was an investment rather than a loan. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In three enumerations of error, Marcum appeals this ruling. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendants and, therefore, we reverse.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ades v. WertherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Dover v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Solomon v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. B-T Two, Inc. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Gardner v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. B-T Two, Inc. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Whitney Morris v. Real Estate Expert Advisors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API