Legal Opinion
Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 27, 1961No. Civ. No. 2459PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINBERGER, District Judge.
On November 28, 1960 defendant made a Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that “There is no genuine issue as to any material facts in this action and that defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
Rule 3(d) (2) of the Local Rules of our District, West’s Ann.Cal.Code provides :
“There shall be served and filed with each motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and proposed summary judgment. Such proposed findings shall state the material facts as to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United Protective Workers of America v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- United States Steel Corporation v. Sim L. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- J. H. Hodges and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- J. H. Hodges and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
- F. J. Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.