Legal Opinion

Owens v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1996No. CR 95-1187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Billy Owens filed a petition in the trial court pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37, challenging his convictions on four counts of delivery of a controlled substance. The petition was denied, and appellant appealed to this court. We affirmed the order of the trial court on the ground that the petition filed in the trial court was not timely. Owens v. State, CR 95-1187 (May 28, 1996). In determining the timeliness of the petition, we relied on the abstract of the record in the appellant’s brief.

Appellant Billy Owens now seeks a rehearing on the ground that the original Rule 37…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Porchia v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Pogue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Fruit v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reavis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Watson v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API