Legal Opinion

Mosler v. Whelan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 15, 1958PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ekastcis, J.

Plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, claiming that defendant had libelled him. The jury unanimously decided otherwise. However, the Appellate Division reversed on the ground that the publication in issue was libelous per se. We granted certification.

The evidence adduced at the trial might well justify a description of the Borough of Paramus, locale of origin of this controversy, as a seething cauldron of political tempest. Such characterization is not disparaging of the borough, for controversy in political and civic affairs…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Julian v. American Business Consultants, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Grant v. Reader's Digest Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Decker v. Princeton Packet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API