Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baldinger v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1961Published

1Dissent

Ughetta, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the order and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and to grant summary judgment in favor of defendant, with the following memorandum: Under its insurance contract the defendant *527is not liable for injury “ caused intentionally ”. The unprovoked assault was deliberate. In fact, intention was an integral element of the original action for assault in which plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendant’s insured (cf. Brodsky v. Rieser, 195 App. Div. 557, 558; McGovern v. Weis, 265 App. Div. 367, 370). That the assailant did not anticipate the extent of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. WeisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Brodsky v. RieserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API