Legal Opinion

Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Fasching

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 17, 2020No. A167409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

749 Argued and submitted August 13, 2019, affirmed June 17, 2020 ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Douglas Dean FASCHING, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 17CV37770; A167409

469 P3d 271

Plaintiff, Arrowood Indemnity Company (Arrowood), paid a lending insti- tution’s insurance claim for losses it sustained after defendant defaulted on his student loans. Arrowood then brought this subrogation action against defendant. In support of its summary judgment motion, Arrowood submitted its claims file, including various proof-of-loss records submitted to it by its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. CACH, LLC v. AskewSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Box v. Oregon State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Whitehead v. ClarnoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API