Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pack v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1949No. 12139Published

1Dissent

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

I dissent.

I am not in accord with the main opinion wherein it is stated that the United States district court did not have jurisdiction to decide the issues between the two claimants to insurance benefits. There was diversity of citizenship present and if Lilly Pack had had any objection to the venue she should have made it known seasonably. See Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 308 U.S. 165, at pages 167, 168, 60 S.Ct. 153, 84 L.Ed. 167, 128 A.L.R. 1437. Instead she pleaded to all of the issues of fact and law by answer and by cross-complaint and requested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Licznerski v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API