Legal Opinion

Seely v. White Motor Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. L. A. 27618Published

Baker, Palmer & Wall and Oran W. Palmer for Defendant and Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

63 Cal.2d 9 (1965)

403 P.2d 145

45 Cal. Rptr. 17

DANIEL J. SEELY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

WHITE MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. L.A. 27618.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 23, 1965.

John M. Nairn for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Baker, Palmer & Wall and Oran W. Palmer for Defendant and Appellant.

TRAYNOR, C.J.

In October 1959 plaintiff entered into a conditional sales contract with Southern Truck Sales for the purchase of a truck manufactured by defendant, White Motor Company. Plaintiff purchased the truck for use in his business of heavy-duty hauling. Upon taking possession…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API