Legal Opinion

In re Directv, Inc.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 6, 2015No. MDL No. 2594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1374ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in eleven actions move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in any convenient, accessible district. Plaintiffs suggest in a footnote to their motion that the Central District of California or the District of Colorado would be acceptable transferee forums; in a later filing, plaintiffs also suggest, without elaboration, the Northern District of Illinois be selected as the transferee forum. Defendants DIRECTV, Inc., and DIRECTV, LLC (collectively DIRECTV), DirectSat USA, LLC,1 DTV…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re CVS Caremark Corp. Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Yellow Brass Plumbing Component Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Uber Technologies, Inc., Wage & Hour Employment PracticesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API